Ace the Alberta Security Guard Test 2025 – Secure Your Success with Style!

Question: 1 / 400

In a retail setting, which of the following is true about the arrest of individuals for theft?

You cannot arrest if they haven't exited the store

You can arrest anyone acting suspiciously

You may arrest individuals seen concealing items

In a retail setting, the ability to arrest individuals for theft is often guided by the principle of "merchant's privilege," which allows a store representative to detain a suspected shoplifter under certain circumstances. When individuals are seen concealing items, it provides reasonable cause to suspect that theft is occurring or about to occur. This observation can justify an arrest or detention for the purpose of investigation.

This action is rooted in the idea that the employee or security personnel has witnessed a clear indication of intent to commit theft, which enables them to take immediate action to prevent loss. This is an important aspect of loss prevention strategies in retail environments, allowing store personnel to act decisively when they have evidence of theft or attempted theft.

Other options do not align with this principle. For example, the notion that one cannot arrest if individuals have not exited the store conflicts with the interpretation of visible concealment as an actionable offense. Moreover, merely acting suspiciously does not meet the legal threshold for reasonable suspicion needed to detain someone for theft. Lastly, while law enforcement has the authority to arrest, security personnel in a retail environment can also act within their rights when they have clear evidence of theft occurring on the premises.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Only the police can make arrests

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy